Signaalin voimakkuus
- Viestiketjun aloittaja SKY-TV
- Aloituspäivämäärä
Nuo mainitsemasi kanavat vaativat hesassakin minimissään 120cm:n, tai isomman lautasen näkyäkseen kunnolla. Katso alla olevista linkeistä, niin näet South Beamin vaatiman lautaskoon.
www.lyngsat.com/dig/skyuk.shtml
www.ses-astra.com/satellites/footprints.php?sat=2
ilmari
www.lyngsat.com/dig/skyuk.shtml
www.ses-astra.com/satellites/footprints.php?sat=2
ilmari
Kanavat ovat ok 13-16 ja 20-09.Muina aikoina signaali on liian heikko.Voiko viritintä jotenkin vahvistaa?Huomasin että Humaxilla tiettyyn aikaan joku kanava näkyi ja kun laitoin skyn boxin kiinni sama kanava ei näkynyt.Kuinka paljon virittimien vastaanottokyvyissä on eroja ja voiko sitä itse parantaa?
>Humaxilla tiettyyn aikaan joku kanava näkyi ja kun laitoin skyn boxin >kiinni sama kanava ei näkynyt.
Sky:n vastaanottimet ovat tunnetusti aika epäherkkiä. Ei niissä ole paljoa kiinnitetty herkkyyteen huomiota, uudet Astrathan ovat varsin voimakkaita Iso-Britanniassa.
On niissä joku malli oikeasti herkempi mutten muista mikä..
Sitä nykyisen boksisi herkkyyttä ei pysty juuri parantamaan.
Sky:n vastaanottimet ovat tunnetusti aika epäherkkiä. Ei niissä ole paljoa kiinnitetty herkkyyteen huomiota, uudet Astrathan ovat varsin voimakkaita Iso-Britanniassa.
On niissä joku malli oikeasti herkempi mutten muista mikä..
Sitä nykyisen boksisi herkkyyttä ei pysty juuri parantamaan.
Netistä lainattua
http://groups.google.fi/groups?hl=f...d8&seekm=9r7jh9$ht6$1@nreadb.inwind.it#link14
"Early Panasonic and Grundig GDS210/2 work best in fringe areas.
Definitely *not* Pace (although it may be OK in parts of Italy.)
http://www.satcure.com"
">>Early Panasonic and Grundig GDS210/2 work best in fringe areas.
>>Definitely *not* Pace (although it may be OK in parts of Italy.)
>
>Isn't it more fundamental than that, something to do with the zero IF
>used on later Pace models that stops them working on the "southern
>beam" (something in Television magazine mentioned this a few months
>ago)
All Pace Digiboxes after the first two models of 2200 have used ZIF
(Zero Intermediate Frequency) tuners - this makes them useless where
there are massive signal differences between adjacent channels - as
happens when you get too far south with the north and south beams from
Astra 28.2E."
>>various Sky boxes available?
>>Which is rated as the best? what are the problems with the others?
>I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that the Panasonic boxes are
>considered the best.
>Yes that's the majority view I would say here, but the Panasonic model >30 is the one people mention. The current 31 seems to not be an >improvement.
http://groups.google.fi/groups?hl=f...d8&seekm=9r7jh9$ht6$1@nreadb.inwind.it#link14
"Early Panasonic and Grundig GDS210/2 work best in fringe areas.
Definitely *not* Pace (although it may be OK in parts of Italy.)
http://www.satcure.com"
">>Early Panasonic and Grundig GDS210/2 work best in fringe areas.
>>Definitely *not* Pace (although it may be OK in parts of Italy.)
>
>Isn't it more fundamental than that, something to do with the zero IF
>used on later Pace models that stops them working on the "southern
>beam" (something in Television magazine mentioned this a few months
>ago)
All Pace Digiboxes after the first two models of 2200 have used ZIF
(Zero Intermediate Frequency) tuners - this makes them useless where
there are massive signal differences between adjacent channels - as
happens when you get too far south with the north and south beams from
Astra 28.2E."
>>various Sky boxes available?
>>Which is rated as the best? what are the problems with the others?
>I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that the Panasonic boxes are
>considered the best.
>Yes that's the majority view I would say here, but the Panasonic model >30 is the one people mention. The current 31 seems to not be an >improvement.